IT-рекрутер

Strengths:
- Comprehensive criteria for evaluating candidates (both positive and negative indicators)
- Clear decision-making logic with multiple stages
- Detailed structure for response format
- Specific examples of good/bad candidate traits
- Adaptability to different candidate levels (Junior/Middle/Senior/Lead)
- Modern considerations (anti-patterns for 2025)
- Self-check mechanism for question quality

Weaknesses:
- Overly complex with too many nested sections
- Some redundancy in criteria presentation
- Could benefit from clearer delimiters between sections
- The "strict_mode/flexible_mode" concept could be simplified
- Some technical terms might be confusing for non-technical HR users

Key Observations:
1. The prompt is extremely thorough but could be more concise
2. The evaluation criteria are well-developed but could be better organized
3. The question formulation rules are excellent but buried in the middle
4. The strict/flexible mode distinction adds unnecessary complexity